Washington – Trump Rescinding DACA Program Protecting Young Immigrants

    22

    Demonstrators protest in front of the White House after the Trump administration today scrapped the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), a program that protects from deportation almost 800,000 young men and women who were brought into the U.S. illegally as children, in Washington, U.S., September 5, 2017. REUTERS/Kevin LamarqueWashington – President Donald Trump’s administration will “wind down” a program protecting hundreds of thousands of young immigrants who were brought into the country illegally as children, Attorney General Jeff Sessions declared Tuesday, calling the Obama administration’s program “an unconstitutional exercise of authority.”

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The government will stop processing new applications under President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program, which has provided nearly 800,000 young immigrants a reprieve from deportation and the ability to work legally in the U.S.

    But the administration is giving Congress six months to come up with a legislative fix before the government stops renewing permits for people already covered by the program.

    “Societies where the rule of law is treasured are societies that tend to flourish and succeed,” Sessions said.

    Trump suggested in an earlier tweet that it would be up to Congress to ultimately decide the fate of those now protected by the program. He tweeted, “Congress, get ready to do your job – DACA!”

    “Make no mistake, we are going to put the interest of AMERICAN CITIZENS FIRST!” Trump added in a second, retweeted message. “The forgotten men & women will no longer be forgotten.”

    Sessions’ announcement came the same day as a deadline set by a group of Republican state officials who said they would challenge DACA in court unless the Trump administration rescinded the program.

    Many believe the program would not hold up in court.

    Trump’s plan to take a harder line on young immigrants unless Congress intervenes threatens to emphasize deep divisions among Republicans who have long struggled with the issue, with one conservative warning of a potential “civil war” within the party. Congressional Republicans have a long history of being unable to act on immigration because of those divisions.

    Trump has spent months wrestling with what to do with DACA, which he slammed during his campaign as illegal “amnesty.” Many of his closest advisers, including Sessions, policy adviser Stephen Miller, and former chief strategist Steve Bannon argue that the program is unconstitutional and have urged Trump to follow through on his campaign promise to end it.

    But Trump has repeatedly expressed sympathy for the young people protected by the program, describing the decision as one of the most difficult he’s had to grapple with as president.

    “I think the Dreamers are terrific,” Trump said last week, using a term popularized by supporters of the program, which was created in 2012 as a stopgap as the Obama administration pushed unsuccessfully for a broader immigration overhaul in Congress.

    All the while, his administration has continued to issue new permits and extensions to immigrants who qualify.

    But his approach — essentially kicking the can down the road and letting Congress deal with it— is fraught with uncertainty and political perils that amount, according to one vocal opponent, to “Republican suicide.”

    Still other Republicans say they are ready to take the issue on.

    “If President Trump makes this decision, we will work to find a legislative solution to their dilemma,” said Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham.

    The Obama administration created the DACA program in 2012 as a stopgap as it pushed unsuccessfully for a broader immigration overhaul in Congress. Many Republicans say they opposed the program on the grounds that it was executive overreach.

    House Speaker Paul Ryan and a handful of other Republicans urged Trump last week to hold off on scrapping DACA to give lawmakers time to come up with a legislative fix.

    But Congress has repeatedly tried — and failed — to come together on immigration overhaul legislation, and it remains uncertain whether the House would succeed in passing anything on the divisive topic.

    One bill addressing the issue that has received the most attention, introduced by Sens. Graham, R-S.C., and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., would grant permanent legal status to more than 1 million young people who arrived in the United States before they turned 18, passed security checks and met other criteria, including enrolling in college, joining the military or finding jobs.

    It’s unclear, however, whether the president would throw his support behind that or any other existing legislation. He could encourage the writing of a new bill — tied, perhaps, to funding for his promised border wall or other concessions like a reduction in legal immigration levels.

    But it’s unclear how much political capital the president would want to put on the line given his base’s strong opposition to illegal immigration, his campaign rhetoric blasting DACA as illegal “amnesty” and his reluctance to campaign hard for other priorities, like health care overhaul.

    Trump’s expected move has sparked protests, phone banks, letter-writing campaigns and other efforts across the country urging him not to act.

    Obama has kept a low profile since Trump took office, but said during his final press conference as president that he would speak out if Trump threatened “kids who have grown up here and for all practical purposes are American kids, and send them someplace else, when they love this country.”

    “They are our kids’ friends and their classmates, and are now entering into community colleges or in some cases serving in our military,” he said, adding that the: “notion that we would just arbitrarily or because of politics punish those kids, when they didn’t do anything wrong themselves, I think would be something that would merit me speaking out.”

     


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    22 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    6 years ago

    “But Trump has repeatedly expressed sympathy for the young people protected by the program, describing the decision as one of the most difficult he’s had to grapple with as president.”

    “Many believe the program would not hold up in court.”

    Trump is being very rational and sympathetic to all party’s involved contrary to hashomer’s rants. He has lots to balance. On the one hand, We need to uphold the law and cannot reward ammensity to everyone’s kids here illegal. On the other hand , these are innocent law abiding citizens who grew up here under no fault of their own.

    And then there is this third hand that pushed Trump against the wall and into a corner by the lawsuit that wold not hold up in court.

    The only solution is to force congress to do something that will make DACA legal and bring together all sides. And he is giving them 6 months. Noone is getting thrown out in the streets tomorrow. And if it does not pass within 6 months they won’t get thrown out either. So before the fake news get everyone hyped up about the evils of Trump and how there will be mass deportations just take a deep breath because that’s not happening. Its the fake news engaging in fear mongering.

    puppydogs
    puppydogs
    6 years ago

    It’s about time

    hashomer
    hashomer
    6 years ago

    Sad day for America. MASS ROUNDUPS, ARRESTS, DEPORTATIONS of 800,000 young people will happen now. Remember when Toxic Trumpf announced that ICE would only DEPORT criminals? The Liar reneged on that promise too. This will be a tipping point on the road to the end of Trumpyism.

    hashomer
    hashomer
    6 years ago

    Over 100 cities and small towns across the USA have already had protests and demonstrations against killing DACA, and against the New Fuhrer. The people are the checks and balances against Sessions and Trumpelstilskin.

    6 years ago

    Sky-is-falling commentators #3 and #4 are so wild that I can’t decide whether they are serious or sarcastic. The facts are that, currently, the 800,000 under DACA are now actually protected for 6 months. The real uncertainty would have been the threatened lawsuits against DACA, scheduled to have started September 5, which is now postponed thanks to Trump’s announcement. Under Obama, two projects similar to DACA had actually lost when brought before a lawsuit.

    If the legislature can’t get its act together over this (and Trump is clearly open to signing a law legalizing “The Dreamers”), then perhaps one should be investigating the real cause. Perhaps there are those who, for example, are concerned about the message transmitted by parading Mexican flags (and some bloggers claim there were signs “Make America Mexico Again”). Sorta leaves the impression they are not adverse to being sent back to Mexico where, apparently, their loyalties lay.

    6 years ago

    ” but given the zealous way ICE has been enforcing immigration this year”

    I thought Trump was a do nothing president who did not keep any campaign promises? Well it looks like he kept his promise on tougher immigration enforcement.

    “Again, there’s no reason to assume “it would be shot down in the courts in a second”
    OK so it will shot down by media images and bad press. Either way you & I know it ain’t happening.

    Now back to your first argument. yes there is no way in telling where the courts would end up. But it would put the Trump justice department in a very uncomfortable position having to defend DACA in the courts against their own party. The simple solution is just force congress and the party to work it out. You would do the same if you were on the top.

    Lastly, yes noone disagrees that logically DACA makes sense in it of itself. The amnesty delimna is that DACA sends a wrong message to illegals by letting them get away with it. Again because the idea behind DACA is a noble one, Trump struggled with what to do. But the bad messaging needs to be addressed. And at the end of the day it will work out.

    grandbear
    grandbear
    6 years ago

    The wordage to be used in this case is illegal aleins.The press and all others label them as emigrants .Their parents came here for the american way of life.