Trump Defends Syria Troop Plan From Criticism Home, Abroad

President Donald Trump talks to reporters on the South Lawn of the White House, Friday, Oct. 4, 2019, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump’s sudden decision to pull back U.S. troops from northern Syria drew quick, strong criticism Monday from some of his closest allies in Congress. It was condemned, too, by Kurdish fighters who would be abandoned to face a likely Turkish assault after fighting alongside Americans for years against the Islamic State.

The announcement threw the military situation in Syria into fresh chaos and injected deeper uncertainty into U.S. relations with European allies. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham called it “a disaster,” while Syria’s Kurds accused the U.S. of turning its back on allies and risking gains made in the yearslong fight against ISIS.

Trump defended his decision, acknowledging in tweets that “the Kurds fought with us” but adding that they “were paid massive amounts of money and equipment to do so.”

“I held off this fight for almost 3 years, but it is time for us to get out of these ridiculous Endless Wars, many of them tribal, and bring our soldiers home,” he wrote.

If the Turks go too far, he tweeted later, “I in my great and unmatched wisdom” will destroy their economy.

Hours after the White House announcement, two senior State Department officials minimized the effects of the U.S. action, telling reporters that only about two dozen American troops would be removed from the Turkey-Syria border, not all the U.S. forces in the northeast of the country. They also said Turkey may not go through with a large-scale invasion and the U.S. was still trying to discourage it.

Both officials spoke only on condition of anonymity to discuss what led to the internal White House decision.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has threatened for months to launch a military operation across the Syrian border. He views the Kurdish forces as a threat to his country. Both Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. have warned that allowing the Turkish attack could lead to a massacre of the Kurds and send a troubling message to American allies across the globe.

U.S. troops “will not support or be involved in the operation” and “will no longer be in the immediate area,” in northern Syria, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said in an unusual late-Sunday statement that was silent on the fate of the Kurds.

There are about 1,000 U.S. troops in northern Syria, and a senior U.S. official said they will pull back from the area — and could depart the country entirely should widespread fighting break out between Turkish and Kurdish forces. For the moment, the U.S. troops are not leaving Syria, officials said.

A U.S. official confirmed that American troops were already moving out of the security zone area, which includes the Syrian towns of Ras al-Ayn and Tal Abyad. That official was not authorized to speak for the record and was granted anonymity to comment.

Republican Sen. Graham of South Carolina said he would call for Turkey’s suspension from NATO and introduce sanctions against Ankara if the Turks attack Kurdish forces.

“This decision to abandon our Kurdish allies and turn Syria over to Russia, Iran, & Turkey will put every radical Islamist on steroids. Shot in the arm to the bad guys. Devastating for the good guys,” Graham wrote in a tweet.

Trump’s move appeared to take even his closest allies by surprise during a pivotal moment of his presidency. House Democrats are marching forward with their impeachment inquiry into whether he compromised national security or abused his office by seeking negative information on former Vice President Joe Biden, a political rival, from foreign countries.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., did say Monday in an appearance on “Fox & Friends” that he had been briefed by the president about the decision. But he also said he had concerns.

“I want to make sure we keep our word for those who fight with us and help us,” he said, adding that, “If you make a commitment and somebody is fighting with you, America should keep their word.”

Former Trump administration officials also expressed alarm.

Nikki Haley, who served as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said the U.S. “must always have the backs of our allies, if we expect them to have our back. … Leaving them to die is a big mistake.”

And Brett McGurk, a former senior diplomat who was the special envoy for the U.S.-led anti-Islamic State coalition until he resigned in protest, accused Trump of leaving “our allies exposed when adversaries call his bluff or he confronts a hard phone call.”

Sunday’s announcement followed a call between Trump and Erdogan, the White House said Sunday.

The decision is an illustration of Trump’s focus on ending American overseas entanglements — one of his key campaign promises. His goals of swift withdrawals in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan have been stymied.

As he faces the impeachment inquiry at home, Trump has appeared more focused on making good on his political pledges, even at the risk of sending a troubling signal to American allies abroad.

In December, Trump announced he would withdraw American troops from Syria but was met with widespread condemnation for abandoning Kurdish allies. That announcement prompted the resignations in protest of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and McGurk, and an effort by then-national security adviser John Bolton to try to protect the Kurds.

Since January, U.S. officials have tried to broker the creation of a “safe zone” in northern Syria to provide a security buffer between the Turkish military and Kurdish forces, but Turkey has repeatedly objected to its slow implementation.

Turkey considers the People’s Protection Units, or YPG, an extension of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK, which has waged an insurgency against Turkey for 35 years.

The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces threatened to respond forcefully to any Turkish incursion.

A Kurdish official speaking on condition of anonymity said Monday the Kurds expected a limited Turkish operation and were still working to ascertain what will happen with American forces in the region.

The White House said Turkey will take custody of foreign fighters captured in the U.S.-led campaign against the Islamic State group who have been held by the Kurdish forces supported by the U.S.

The Kurds have custody of thousands of captured Islamic State militants. They include about 2,500 highly dangerous foreign fighters from Europe and elsewhere whose native countries have been reluctant to take them back and another 10,000 or so captured fighters from Syria and Iraq.

Trump has repeatedly demanded that European countries, particularly France and Germany, take back their citizens who joined the militant organization. He wrote Monday that it will now be up to countries in the region to decide what to do with captured fighters, and warned of retribution in response to any future attacks.

“We are 7,000 miles away and will crush ISIS again if they come anywhere near us!” he wrote.

IS was defeated in Iraq in 2017. In Syria it lost its last territory in March, marking the end of the extremists’ self-declared caliphate. Despite these battlefield defeats, IS sleeper cells have continued to launch attacks in Iraq and Syria.

Follow VosIzNeias For Breaking News Updates is here to help you manage your home without the stress. Go to for recipes, menu planners, kids' activities, and more.


    • silly paranioa
      1) He loves Israel and hates all those muslims
      2) He gets no benefit from helping them and our troops are out risk. Contrast that to israel
      3) Who says he threw anyone under the bus? We still have the kurds full back. We won’t let Turkey get near them.

  1. Trump defends his vile action. So did Neville Chamberlain falsely saying ‘Peace in our time’. Thrre was ‘peace’ in the death pits for 6 million as a result. How many Kurdish people will be murdered by evil Turks as a result of this historic betrayal of a US ally? Where is President Pence on this one?

  2. The Kurds have helped our forces and unrestrained the Turks will butcher the Kurds. Shouldn’t the US at least show some hakorus hatov to the Kurdish minority.
    If my son were in Syria it would be because he volunteered in our all volunteer army.
    Donald Trump dodged the draft with imaginary bone spurs documented by a podiatrist who was a tenant of the Trumps. Huge difference between my son and Donald Trump.

  3. I agree with the pullout from Syria; also, after 74 years, we should withdraw from Germany and Japan. Germany has a good army and can take care of itself. We should not have to continue footing the bill to protect them, as the Cold War is over, and Angela is buddy buddy, with the Ruskies. The same goes for the Japanese; there is constant friction between the GI’s stationed in Okinawa and the local population. The Japanese Self Defense Force can take care of their own country. Also, after eighteen years, it is about time that our troops were brought home from Afghanistan, where they are sitting ducks, because of IED’s, and Afghani troops, who are double agents for the Taliban. Regarding Iraq, I don’t trust those corrupt Iraqis one iota. I can’t understand why our troops were sent back to that hell hole. If the Iraqis can’t fight their own battles, too bad. It should be noted that during the 1960’s, there were over 1,000,000 American troops stationed abroad. Now, the number is down to around 400,000. It costs a lot of money to maintain such a large force overseas. The American taxpayer would like to see some improvements at home, vis-a-vis decent highways without potholes, decent bridges which won’t collapse, decent airports, which are clean and well maintained, and last, but not least, a decent passenger railroad system, which barely exists in the USA. It is impossible to have those things, with money being wasted overseas, on endless wars, which have brought us nothing but misery, heartache, and an explosion of the federal deficit, which our great-great grandchildren will be paying for.

    • Afghanistan is a bit more complicated. Thats where Al-Qeda emerged and they will emerge again. Yes its a hell hole but how should we stop them from remerging? In Syria, we have Assad to stop them. Hillary should have never supported the arab spring. And yes Bush should have nveer chucked Saddam. Big mitsake. I like Bush alot but I think he erred. The world would be better off with a crazy weak guy like Saddam who keeps his chickens in their coup. Same with Assad. he is weak and Israel can smakc him around. Sure he is an Iran ally and sme danger exists. But he is weak and the best solution out there



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here