Sec. Pompeo Announces Softening Of US Position On Israeli Settlements [VIDEO]

38
Sec. Mike Pompeo addresses reporters on Monday November 11, 2019 (Source: Screenshot)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced on Monday that the U.S. is softening its position on Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, the latest in a series of Trump administration moves that weaken Palestinian claims to statehood.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


Pompeo’s announcement repudiates a 1978 State Department legal opinion that held that civilian settlements in the occupied territories are “inconsistent with international law.” The move will likely anger Palestinians and put the U.S. at odds with other nations working to end the conflict.

The Trump administration views the opinion, the basis for long-standing U.S. opposition to expanding the settlements, as a distraction and believes any legal questions about the issue should be addressed by Israeli courts, according to a draft of Pompeo’s remarks on the policy obtained by The Associated Press.

“Calling the establishment of civilian settlements inconsistent with international law has not advanced the cause of peace,” Pompeo says in the draft. “The hard truth is that there will never be a judicial resolution to the conflict, and arguments about who is right and who is wrong as a matter of international law will not bring peace.”

Soon after Pompeo’s announcement, PM Netanyahu reacted in a video message, describing today as a “historical day.”

U.S. administration moves that have weakened Palestinian efforts to achieve statehood have included President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, the movement of the U.S. Embassy to that city and the closure of the Palestinian diplomatic office in Washington.

Ayman Odeh, leader of the Joint List of Arab parties in Israel’s Knesset, wrote on Twitter that the change in policy won’t “change the fact that the settlements were built on occupied land upon which an independent Palestinian state will be founded alongside Israel.”

Even though the decision is largely symbolic, it could also give a boost to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is fighting for his political survival after he was unable to form a coalition government following recent elections.

In addition, it could spell further trouble for the administration’s oft-promised peace plan, which is unlikely to gather much international support by endorsing a position contrary to the global consensus.

The Netanyahu government was dealt a blow on settlements just last week when the European Court of Justice ruled products made in Israeli settlements must be labeled as such.

Israeli Transportation Minister Betzalel Smotrich, a West Bank settler and head of a pro-settler party, wrote on Twitter that the anticipated announcement is “an appropriate response to the hypocritical decision by the European court last week.”

The 1978 legal opinion on settlements is known as the Hansell Memorandum. It had been the basis for more than 40 years of carefully worded U.S. opposition to settlement construction that had varied in its tone and strength depending on the president’s position.

The international community overwhelmingly considers the settlements illegal. This is based in part on the Fourth Geneva Convention, which bars an occupying power from transferring parts of its own civilian population to occupied territory.

In the final days of the Obama administration, the U.S. allowed the U.N. Security Council to pass a resolution declaring the settlements a “flagrant violation” of international law.

Pompeo was expected to say that the U.S. would not take a position on the legality of specific settlements and that that the new policy would not extend beyond the West Bank and create a precedent for other territorial disputes.

He also planned to say that the decision did not mean the administration was prejudging the status of the West Bank in any eventual Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement.

The shift is a victory for Netanyahu, a longtime booster of the settlements, and had been strongly supported by U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman and big Trump donor Sheldon Adelson. Friedman was a major fundraiser for the settlements before becoming ambassador.

It may be taken by Netanyahu and the settlement movement as a green light for additional construction, or even annexation, of lands claimed by the Palestinians for a future state.

The anti-settlement monitoring group Peace Now, along with AP reporting, has found a sharp increase in settlement planning and construction since Trump took office.

For Netanyahu, the welcome boost comes at a time when he has been weakened domestically by mounting legal woes and two inconclusive elections this year.

Unable to secure a parliamentary majority, Netanyahu is now anxiously waiting to see if his chief rival, Benny Gantz, can put together a coalition. If Gantz fails, the country could be forced into a third election with Netanyahu facing the distraction of a trial.

Israel captured the West Bank and east Jerusalem in the 1967 Mideast war and quickly began settling the newly conquered territory.

Today, some 700,000 Israeli settlers live in the two areas, which are both claimed by the Palestinians for their state.

After the war, it immediately annexed east Jerusalem, home to the holy city’s most important religious sites, in a move that is not internationally recognized.

But Israel has never annexed the West Bank, even as it has dotted the territory with scores of settlements and tiny settlement outposts.

While claiming the fate of the settlements is a subject for negotiations, it has steadily expanded them. Some major settlements have over 30,000 residents, resembling small cities and serving as suburbs of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

The Palestinians and most of the world say the settlements undermine hopes for a two-state solution by gobbling up land sought by the Palestinians.

Israel’s settlement activities have also drawn attention to its treatment of Palestinians.

While Jewish settlers can freely enter Israel and vote in Israeli elections, West Bank Palestinians are subject to Israeli military law, require permits to enter Israel and do not have the right to vote in Israeli elections.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


38 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Educated Archy
Educated Archy
4 years ago

Mr yingele

Do you understand what better for Israel means ? It’s policy and how much we kick the Muslims where it counts . It’s not just yeah we gave Israel a few more weapon toys

yingele
yingele
4 years ago

This is great for Ganz not for the State of Israel and for sure not for the Orthodox. with 2.2 million new arab votes (Ganz/Lapid/arab s coalition is getting much much stronger in seats.They might form a Govt in 2 days with 4 extra votes. It will be 25 extra votes . Oh I forgot maybe you think the Supreme Court of Israel will not give any rights to the arabas (I doubt this) The UN will declare it Apartheid and in a year Bernie/AOC will not likely to vote it down. PUTIN will be happy He voted against Israel ever single time in the UN but never been able to convince the USA to do so. Now he gets his wishes delivered by Trumps actions.

"can't
"can't
4 years ago

explaim “can’t was being pro Israel”

yingele
yingele
4 years ago

“cant was being pro Israel” means that when Obama did good for Israel this deplorable’ s called him antisemitic for helping Israel or other Jews. There is no need to go over just how much Obama did. 27 Billion US $ (More than Nixon,Reagan combined) Patriots missiles and the most advanced weaponry turns into “A few EDUCATED weapon TOYS” and Deplorable “can’t was being pro Israel” whatever that means to some unedutaed deplorables who like to “toy” with Israels future.

Phineas
Phineas
4 years ago

So kissing up to Erdogan, letting Russia dominate Syria, driving the formerly pro-U.S. Kurds into Assad’s arms, not confronting Russia about Iran’s free reign in Syria is when someone is pro-Israel but doesn’t know what he’s doing.

John smithson
John smithson
4 years ago

Gd bless our President. Our Korash (Cyrus) helping in bringing down the third Temple from on high!!! MAGA MAGA and more Maga!!!!

Yehuda Leib
Yehuda Leib
4 years ago

How will this change anything? Does this have any affect on peace and security? Did the Israelis push for this? Why now?

"can't
"can't
4 years ago

Reading the comments I hope you have sufficient mental health care on whatever plan you are insuired

Nachum
Nachum
4 years ago

North Vietnam, invaded and occupied South Vietnam, in violation of international law; it relocated a percentage of its population to South Vietnam, when it took over the entire country, in 1975. The UN has been silent about that matter for over 44 years. What is its explanation?