House Impeachment Report Looks At Abuse, Bribery, Corruption

32
FILE - In this March 7, 2019, file photo, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., speak to reporters at the Capitol in Washington. The House Judiciary Committee is moving to the forefront of President Donald Trump’s impeachment, starting with a hearing Wednesday, Dec. 4 to examine the “high crimes and misdemeanors” set out in the Constitution. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Previewing potential articles of impeachment, the House Democrats on Saturday issued a lengthy report drawing on history and the Founding Fathers to lay out the legal argument over the case against President Donald Trump’s actions toward Ukraine.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


The findings from the House Judiciary Committee do not spell out the formal charges against the president, which are being drafted ahead of votes, possibly as soon as next week. Instead, the report refutes Trump’s criticism of the impeachment proceedings, arguing that the Constitution created impeachment as a “safety valve” so Americans would not have to wait for the next election to remove a president. It refers to the writings of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and others to link Trump’s actions in his July phone call with Ukraine’s president seeking political investigations of his rivals to the kind of behavior that would “horrify” the framers.

“Where the President uses his foreign affairs power in ways that betray the national interest for his own benefit, or harm national security for equally corrupt reasons, he is subject to impeachment by the House,” the Democrats wrote. “Indeed, foreign interference in the American political system was among the gravest dangers feared by the Founders of our Nation and the Framers of our Constitution.”

Democrats are working through the weekend as articles are being drafted and committee members are preparing for a hearing Monday. Democrats say Trump abused his power in the July 25 phone call when he asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy for a favor and engaged in bribery by withholding nearly $400 million in military aide that Ukraine depends on to counter Russian aggression.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi says it’s part of a troubling pattern of behavior from Trump that benefits Russia and not the U.S.

Trump has insisted he did nothing wrong. “Witch Hunt!”the president tweeted Saturday morning.

The articles of impeachment are likely to encompass two major themes — abuse of office and obstruction — as Democrats strive to reach the Constitution’s bar of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

In releasing his report Saturday, Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said the president’s actions are the framers’ “worst nightmare.”

“President Trump abused his power, betrayed our national security, and corrupted our elections, all for personal gain. The Constitution details only one remedy for this misconduct: impeachment,” Nadler said in a statement. “The safety and security of our nation, our democracy, and future generations hang in the balance if we do not address this misconduct. In America, no one is above the law, not even the President.”

The report released Saturday is an update of similar reports issued during the Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton impeachments and lays out the justification for articles under consideration, including abuse of power, bribery and obstruction.

It does not lay out the facts of the Ukraine case, but it hints at potential articles of impeachment and explains the thinking behind Democrats’ decision to draft them. Without frequently mentioning Trump, it alludes to his requests that Ukraine investigate Democrats, a move he believed would benefit him politically, by saying a president who “perverts his role as chief diplomat to serve private rather than public ends” has unquestionably engaged in the high crimes and misdemeanors laid out in the Constitution. That is true “especially” if he invited rather than opposed foreign interference, the report says.

The report examines treason, bribery, serious abuse of power, betrayal of the national interest through foreign entanglements and corruption of office and elections. Democrats have been focused on an overall abuse of power article, with the possibility of breaking out a separate, related article on bribery. They are also expected to draft at least one article on obstruction of Congress, or obstruction of justice.

In laying out the grounds for impeachable offenses, the report directly refutes several of the president’s claims in a section called “fallacies about impeachment,” including that the inquiry is based on secondhand evidence, that a president can do what he wants to do, and that Democrats’ motives are corrupt.

“The President’s honesty in an impeachment inquiry, or his lack thereof, can thus shed light on the underlying issue,” the report says.

In pushing ahead with the impeachment inquiry, Democrats are bringing the focus back to Russia.

Pelosi is connecting the dots — “all roads lead to Putin,” she says — and making the argument that Trump’s pressure campaign on Ukraine was not an isolated incident but part of a troubling bond with the Russian president reaching back to special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings on the 2016 election interference.

“This isn’t about Ukraine,” she explained a day earlier. “‘It’s about Russia. Who benefited by our withholding of that military assistance? Russia.”

It’s an attempt to explain why Americans should care that Trump pushed Ukraine to investigate rival Joe Biden while withholding the military aid that Congress had approved.

At the same time, by tracing the arc of Trump’s behavior from the 2016 campaign to the present, it stitches it all together. And that helps the speaker balance her left-flank liberals, who want more charges brought against Trump, including from Mueller’s report, and centrist Democrats who prefer to keep the argument more narrowly focused on Ukraine.

Pelosi and her team are trying to convey a message that impeachment is indeed about Ukraine, but also about a pattern of behavior that could stoke renewed concern about his attitude toward Russia ahead of the 2020 election.

Trump pushed back on the Democrats’ message. “The people see that it’s just a continuation of this three-year witch hunt,” he told reporters as he left the White House on a trip to Florida.

Late Friday, White House counsel Pat Cipollone informed the Judiciary Committee that the administration would not be participating in upcoming hearings, decrying the proceedings as “completely baseless.”

And Trump’s campaign announced new rallies taking the case directly to voters — as well as a new email fundraising pitch that claims the Democrats have “gone absolutely insane.”

“The Democrats have NO impeachment case and are demeaning our great Country at YOUR expense,” Trump wrote in the email to supporters. “It’s US against THEM.”

Impeachment articles could include obstruction of Congress, as the White House ordered officials not to comply with House subpoenas for testimony or documents in the inquiry. They could also include obstruction of justice, based on Mueller’s report on the original Trump-Russia investigation.

There is still robust internal debate among House Democrats over how many articles to write and how much to include — and particularly whether there should be specific mention of Mueller’s findings from his two-year investigation into Trump’s possible role in Russia’s 2016 election interference.

The special counsel could not determine that Trump’s campaign conspired or coordinated with Russia. However, Mueller said he could not exonerate Trump of obstructing justice in the probe and left it for Congress to determine.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


32 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nadler's Murder Inc.
Nadler's Murder Inc.
4 years ago

Those that dismissed that pastor who talked about a Jewcoup as a lunatic , and rightfully so, will unfortunately be soon subjected to more sane and mainstream attacks which will shatter Jewish leftie illusions.This Jewish Nadler & Gang of lawmakers & witnesses are causing us needless angst.

I say
I say
4 years ago

Adam shiff and Jerry Nadler are evil people.

Educated Archy
Educated Archy
4 years ago

Yawn! good luck Nadler. Thanks for helping in trump’s relection bid.

Sunnydale
Sunnydale
4 years ago

It’s about to get worse. Here comes Lawrence Tribe Jew Oxford professor to join Nadler’s coup putsch. Add him to Noah Feldman Jew & Pam Karlan selfavowed Jewish lesbian and white male supremacy theorist.
Ignore and mock Jew Coup at your peril but here it comes. We need to speak out forcefully against the Jewish dregs in our midst and need the Jewish orgs like the OU , ZOA and Agudah to step up. Now.

Phineas
Phineas
4 years ago

In an open letter to congress, more than 600 academics from law schools including Yale, Rutgers and Harvard said it would be constitutional to remove the president.

“There is overwhelming evidence that President Trump betrayed his oath of office by seeking to use presidential power to pressure a foreign government to help him distort an American election, for his personal and political benefit, at the direct expense of national security interests as determined by Congress,” they wrote.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-impeachment-more-600-law-010131675.html

“His conduct is precisely the type of threat to our democracy that the founders feared when they included the remedy of impeachment in the constitution.”

The scholars said their conclusion was based on the evidence heard so far in the impeachment hearings of Mr Trump’s attempt to pressure Ukraine into investigating his political rival Joe Biden.

That includes testimony from US officials Gordon Sondland and William Taylor and Mr Trump’s phone call with the Ukrainian president.

The scholars said they were not giving their opinion on whether the president committed a crime.

They concluded: “Ultimately, whether to impeach the President and remove him from office depends on judgments that the Constitution leaves to Congress.

“But if the House of Representatives impeached the President for the conduct described here and the Senate voted to remove him, they would be acting well within their constitutional powers.

“Whether President Trump’s conduct is classified as bribery, as a high crime or misdemeanor, or as both, it is clearly impeachable under our Constitution.”

Was a democrat until I saw the light
Was a democrat until I saw the light
4 years ago

It’s correct only wrong party be investigated

Sovietsky
Sovietsky
4 years ago

Wipe your fanny with this leftie list. What evidence other than hearsay do you have? Are you deranged? What did Trump do? Is he entitled to due process in this still democratic land or no?
Are the list profs as loony as those that testified?
Why doesn’t the whistlebiower and Schitte testify? Spare us links and academic leftie trolls.
Give evidence or forever shut your mouths.

Thinkforyourself 101
Thinkforyourself 101
4 years ago

Oh come on. We know that universities hire lefties and progressives over conservatives 300 to 1 . The colleges are bastions of American hating intellects who rob students blind and who are in debt for the rest of their lives. The professors infuse students with progressive garbage and stink, this is a fact. Our very institutions have been overrun by the left. Judges, librarians, and now even corporations.
That’s what the 2016 electiin was about. Millions of Americans besides NY and Calf. throwing off the opressive yoke of these cannibals who do nothing but fress the values and beliefs of our society. A list of professors?
Are you that naive?
Like the Population Explosion professors decades ago who predicted world starvation? Climate Change kooks who babble about the end of the world?
Really??

Ox-Ferd
Ox-Ferd
4 years ago

The talk today is to not send your kids to colleges. They do not advocate open mindedness but shut down down debate and opposing viewpoints. The sane professors who oppose your toilet list are not invited on CNN.
All across America professors and brainwashed students protest and wreak havoc when a conservative is slated to appear. Gimme a break.

??????
??????
4 years ago

Sondland clearly stated that there was no quid pro quo. Clearly said it. What channel were you watching? Hearsay only relevant in court of law? Duh… what are you saying ?
This whistleblower a Dem supporter MUST testify. SHITTE Must testify. What do you think ? You’re going to remove a president on hearsay and Pam Karlan? Are you crazy?
I would argue this even he were Obama whom I detest.

Phineas
Phineas
4 years ago

Actually, all you need is what Mulvaney said.

Kookel
Kookel
4 years ago

It looks more and more, Phineas, that you’re not really aware of what’s going on , but clearly gulping Koolaid wirh tons of sugar.It’s apparent that you’re just googling, googling, googling on all antiTrump sites and regurgitating. Truth be told, Google DOES manipulate searches and you’ve been manipulated.

WHATDIFFERENCEDUZITMAKE??
WHATDIFFERENCEDUZITMAKE??
4 years ago

Hey phin. Nobody gives a darn . Every president lays down the law to countries who receive our aid. Do such and such or else you get zippo. We just don’t or shouldn’t throw $$$ without knowing what’s going on in the country. Obama hinted this to Israel. Ukranian government before Zalesky was the 2nd most corrupt in Europe. Why should my tax $$ go there if they don’t clean up?
That’s not what bothers you. Russian collusion Haha, and Trump’s election bother you. Snow will first freeze over in hell before he’s ousted. Will never happen – now donate to the Clinton Fraudation.

Peach
Peach
4 years ago

I don’t need Mulvaney, you need him. I want facts, evidence beyond reasonable doubt, before hating devils remove my president.

TheTrial... Kafka
TheTrial... Kafka
4 years ago

So let’s take a peek at your star witnesses, shall we?
Sondland, who absolutely swore that Trump did nothing wrong was bombarded with lefties who protested his hotel to make sure he stuck to the party line, and was recently accused of harassment. Vindman the arrogant pompous uniformed traitor has disappeared. This nobody who wanted to run foreign policy.
Deep Staters Kent and Taylor had nothing except he said, she said.
The crybaby actress whatz her name, the ambassadoress was a pouty child who lost her job. Aww….
And…. I kid you not, “Constitution” professors testifying about the very Constitution that they & Dems want to destroy. You can’t make this stuff up.

Lou Costello
Lou Costello
4 years ago

Phineass now pulsating on Mulvaney.
Watch:
From Flynn to Cohen to Avanatti’s chick, now racing to Putin, to Dossier , to Comey, to Brennan, to invoking 25th Amendment, to racism, back to Putin, racism again, Anonymous Slimes column, books , to emoluments, to 25th Amendment again, Mueller, Mueller, Mueller, to incitement to impeachmentPelosiSchffNadlerbombshells to………… Whew , lemme catch my breath… to Who? MULVANEY, stupid.. Mulvaney. You know something people? Maybe there’s something to Climate Change after all , the drinking water is affected.

Hawthorne's Guest
Hawthorne's Guest
4 years ago

Well, Phineas, it’s comforting to know that for 3 years
you didn’t want impeachment until Mulvaney popped in.

anonymous
anonymous
4 years ago

Hawthorne? Lou Castella,? Kafka,? Peach,? whatdiffarance.? Kookel? All 7 newbees followed Educated within 1 hour. Hmmm? Educated is working hard today. Deserve to get paid time and a half.

Abbott/ Costello
Abbott/ Costello
4 years ago

Anony- mouse
Don’t know who educated archie is but I’m
Costello. So who have you been lately??
Or u jist spred yourself thin?

Giddyapp Trigger !!!
Giddyapp Trigger !!!
4 years ago

Anony-mouse, why can’t you accept that millions disagree with Fineeus?

Tumbalalaika
Tumbalalaika
4 years ago

Hey kids, anonymice is Phinny in the play.

Enonimiss
Enonimiss
4 years ago

Anonymous and Phineas are 1