Schumer: I ‘Shouldn’t Have Used’ Threatening Words on Court

9
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. speaks during abortion rights rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, March 4, 2020. The Supreme Court is taking up the first major abortion case of the Trump era Wednesday, an election-year look at a Louisiana dispute that could reveal how willing the more conservative court is to roll back abortion rights. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said Thursday that he “should not have used the words I used” when he declared in front of the Supreme Court that two justices would “pay the price” for their decision in an abortion case.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


Republicans chastised Schumer for the remark and Chief Justice John Roberts in a rare rebuke said the words were “inappropriate” and “dangerous.” Speaking on the Senate floor Thursday, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called Schumer’s words “astonishingly reckless and completely irresponsible” and said they could have “horrific unintended consequences.” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, floated the idea of a censure.

Schumer directed the comments at Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh at the rally while a significant abortion case was being argued at the high court.

“You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You will not know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions,” Schumer said, naming the two appointees of President Donald Trump, according to video of the rally.

Schumer did not back down from the comments on Wednesday evening, with his spokesman criticizing Roberts as not remaining impartial. But Schumer clarified the next morning that he meant political consequences for the justices, not physical ones. He said that it was a “gross distortion” to imply otherwise.

“I’m from Brooklyn, we speak in strong language,” Schumer said. “I shouldn’t have used the words I did, but in no way was I making a threat. I never, never would do such a thing. And Leader McConnell knows that, and Republicans who are busy manufacturing outrage over these comments know that too.”

He said he made the comments because he feels passionately about protecting abortion rights.

“I feel so deeply, the anger of women all across America,” Schumer said. “About Senate Republicans and the courts, working hand in glove to take down Roe v Wade.”

Schumer spoke for less than four minutes at the rally, just as arguments got underway in the first major abortion case since Trump’s two appointees, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, joined the court. The Democrat invoked the two justices whose nominations he opposed, giving a thumbs-down gesture to provoke boos from the crowd.

His reference to a “whirlwind” hearkened back to Kavanaugh’s own passionate opening statement at a 2018 confirmation hearing. The judge lashed out at Democratic members of the committee who had criticized him as the panel reviewed decades-old sexual assault allegations against him.

“I fear the country will reap the whirlwind,” Kavanaugh said then.

Hours after the rally where Schumer appeared, Roberts issued the statement singling out his comments. “Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous,” Roberts said.

It was only the second time that the chief justice has responded to criticism of individual judges. In 2018, Roberts rebuked Trump for the president’s criticism of an “Obama judge.”

But he has otherwise stayed silent, including in recent weeks when Trump questioned the impartiality of Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, and U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who presided over the trial and sentencing of Trump ally Roger Stone.

Likewise, Senate Republicans did not criticize those comments.

The justices are weighing a Louisiana law requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. A federal judge found that just one of Louisiana’s three abortion clinics would remain open if the law is allowed to take effect.

Roberts is expected to be the deciding vote. The court struck down a similar law in 2016, before Kavanaugh and Gorsuch joined the court.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


9 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yankel
Yankel
4 years ago

This bum should be thrown out of the Senate not just censured.

Yankel
Yankel
4 years ago

Not only does he admit talking like a mobster but he lays it on Brooklynites as if all Brooklynites are mobsters like him.

anonymous
anonymous
4 years ago

No mobster or mafiosi ever threatened a judge. This punk should be thrown to hungry dogs.

Stan Oliver
Stan Oliver
4 years ago

Can a Senator be impeached?

Democrats support Jew haters and are anti religious freedom
Democrats support Jew haters and are anti religious freedom
4 years ago

Chucky Schmucky the treasonous fascist Senate minority leader who threatens SCOTUS justices because they may vote to uphold a law that will protect women from abortionists like mass murderer gosnell.

lipa99
lipa99
4 years ago

Republican senator Josh Hawley is planning on censuring Chuck Schumer for his threats to Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Hawley wrote, “Now @chuckschumer is threatening Supreme Court Justices personally, to the point of implying their physical safety is endangered. Disgusting, shameful, and frankly, WEAK,” Hawley wrote on social media. “I would call on Schumer to apologize, but we all know he has no shame. So tomorrow I will introduce a motion to censure Schumer for his pathetic attempt at intimidation of #SupremeCourt.”

Enough Already
Enough Already
4 years ago

The audacity of that mutt is incredible.
He just loves to open his mouth and get his ugly mug in front of a camera.
Censuring him isn’t enough, he needs to be publicly humiliated and investigated by those charged with protecting Justice Roberts.