UK U-Turns On Masks As Lockdown-Easing Steps Spark Confusion

In this photo issued by 10 Downing Street on Sunday, May 10, 2020, Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson delivers an address on lifting the country's lockdown amid the coronavirus pandemic. Johnson announced a modest easing of the country’s coronavirus lockdown and outlined his government’s road map for further lifting restrictions in the coming months. In a televised address to the nation, Johnson said people in Britain who can’t work from home, such as those in construction or manufacturing jobs, “should be actively encouraged to go to work” this week. (Andrew Parsons/10 Downing Street via AP)

LONDON (AP) — The British government performed an about-face on masks Monday, telling people to cover their mouth and nose in shops, buses and subway trains. The change came as part of a plan to gradually lift a nationwide lockdown imposed seven weeks ago to slow the spread of the new coronavirus.

In a 50-page document outlining cautious steps to ease restrctions, Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government said “people should aim to wear a face-covering in enclosed spaces where social distancing is not always possible and they come into contact with others that they do not normally meet, for example on public transport or in some shops.”

That is a recommendation rather than a rule, and people won’t be penalized if they don’t wear a mask.

The government outlined a three-stage approach to ending lockdown, beginning Wednesday with a relaxing of limits on outdoor activity. People in England may take unlimited amounts of exercise, rather than just one trip out a day, and may sit and sunbathe outdoors. Driving to a park or beach will be permitted, and golf courses and tennis courts can reopen.

If there is no new spike in infections, that will be followed in June by a return to class for some young school pupils, the reopening of nonessential shops and the return of televised sports, played behind closed doors. A third stage, penciled in for July at the soonest, would see the gradual reopening of restaurants, cafes, pubs, hairdressers and other businesses.

But the document warned that “if the data suggests the virus is spreading again, the government will have to tighten restrictions, possibly at short notice.”

While many people welcomed the prospect of an end to lockdown, police organizations warned that the new rules were fuzzy and made enforcement harder.

Employees, business owners and trade unions expressed concern about a switch in emphasis about the workplace. Since March 23, workers have been told to stay at home. Now they are being encouraged to return to work — but preferably without getting near other people or using public transport.

In a televised statement Sunday, Johnson extended most of the draconian restrictions on daily life imposed March 23, including the closure of schools, restaurants and most shops.

Britain’s official coronavirus death toll stands at almost 32,000, the highest in Europe and the second-highest in the world after the United States. While the number of new deaths and infections is falling, Johnson said it would be “madness” to loosen restrictions so much that there is a new surge in cases.

But he made a dramatic shift in tone on the economy, saying “anyone who can’t work from home, for instance those in construction or manufacturing, should be actively encouraged to go to work.”

He said workplaces should observe social distancing and people should avoid public transport if possible, traveling “by car or even better by walking or bicycle.”

Critics said the advice was confusing, hard to follow and potentially dangerous — especially in a big city like London, where most people do not own cars and where subways are operating at a fraction of their usual capacity.

Some expressed fears that people in low-paid jobs, who are less likely to be able to work from home, will be put in danger. That concern was underscored by official statistics showing that men working as security guards, construction workers, transit workers and shop assistants had experienced higher-than-average mortality in the outbreak. Men overall are about twice as likely as women to die with the coronavirus.

After Johnson spoke, London Major Sadiq Khan issued a statement stressing that the lockdown had not been lifted and saying Londoners “must not use public transport for any unnecessary journeys.”

London’s Waterloo station, usually the country’s busiest train hub, remained largely quiet Monday morning but commuters venturing back to work said they worried that services would soon be thronged again.

Peter Osu, 45, who was returning to work at a construction site for the first time since the lockdown started, said he felt nervous.

“People were sitting close together on the (subway) and others were having to stand,” he said. “There was no 2-meter spacing. This is the first day. Can you imagine what it’s going to look like by the end of the week?”

The reopening plan has put Johnson’s U.K. government at odds with semi-autonomous authorities in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, who urged more caution and said they would not automatically adopt the measures Johnson has announced for England.

Johnson, who was hospitalized last month with a serious bout of COVID-19, also said that within weeks the U.K. would impose a 14-day quarantine on people arriving by air. Travelers from Ireland and France will be exempt.

Follow VosIzNeias For Breaking News Updates is here to help you manage your home without the stress. Go to for recipes, menu planners, kids' activities, and more.


  1. every country has a solid plan except for the USA….the results speak for themselves….worst response to virus of any advanced country (except for Brazil)….Trumps absolute incompetence and complete lack of leadership laid bare for all to see

    • Correction: every state has a solid plan, except for New York, which has 40% of the country’s cases and deaths. The results, as you say, speak for themselves.

      See, Henry, perhaps in your law classes you never covered the Constitution of the United States. If so, do yourself a favor and pull it out, and read up a bit about federalism.

  2. I get it now. In a national emergency of unparalleled proportions, the federal government has no role.. The Constitution mandates that the President’s role be limited to that of “cheerleader.” Other countries who coordinate a unified response have got it all wrong. The statistics that show our response to be the worst in the advanced world are fake news…Trump is infallible–just ask him

    • I see. So I guess you still haven’t looked at the Constitution, which is… wait for it… “of the United States.” It even says so in the headline, for folks like you who can’t bother with the finer details. (One wonders how you ever kept a law practice going.) Other countries have their own constitutions and their own ways of doing things; in this country, the federal government has very few enumerated powers, with the rest being reserved to the states or to the people.

      So in some states, such as Florida and Georgia, the governors have had the common sense to do the right thing (which, let it be noted, didn’t include draconian shutdowns), and are doing fairly well; whereas in other states, such as New York, feckless governors and mayors have done things like keep the subways open and mandate that coronavirus patients be sent back to nursing homes, and naturally the death toll there has been far higher. Meanwhile, in your state of California it’s been announced that people are going to be separated from their families, which I seem to recall not so long ago was being decried as un-American and Nazi-like and so forth, but which suddenly apparently is fine with you.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here