Ramat Gan Resident Threatened With Municipal Fine For Shema Yisrael Sign On Store

6

RAMAT GAN (VINnews) — Amnon Goldis is a wine store owner in Ramat Gan, a city with many religious residents bordering Bnei Brak. After seeing all the LGBT flags being hung by the municipality to mark Gay Pride month, Goldis decided in response to place a sign bearing the words of Shema Yisrael on top of his wine store. Almost immediately afterwards Goldis received a telephone call from the municipality warning him to take down his sign or pay a fine for the illegal sign. He also received a warning letter from a municipal inspector stating the same thing.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


Goldis told Bechadrei Chareidim that “this is an anti-Semitic municipality. It is unacceptable that the municipality should threaten me for placing a Jewish sign, while flags which hurt many people’s feelings are fluttering around town.”

Goldis even said he would replace the sign over his store with the Shema Yisrael sign if necessary, but the municipality said that this would require authorization by a municipal committee. “A city which takes months to solve problems suddenly needs urgently to remove a sign,” Goldis responded.

Goldis’s story made waves in the city and hundreds of residents, both religious and secular came to his store to express solidarity with him. Some even offered to pay the fine for him. Goldis has declared that he will refuse to take down the sign even if he has to pay numerous fines.

Image

A number of residents decided to start a campaign and hang thousands of Shema Yisrael signs in a display of identity with Goldis. Pini, a resident of Ramat Gan, told Bechadrei that “the story aroused a storm among locals. We sat together and decided to start an initiative of hanging signs to identify with Goldis. Everything was done voluntarily with no profit motive. There are good people who heard about the initiative and committed to helping us. Hundreds have called asking for a sign.”

One resident even offered to print the signs for free for whoever wishes to hang a sign outside his home.

Ramat Gan mayor Carmel Shama-Cohen responded angrily to the claims stating that “yesterday a religious media outlet spread the word that in Ramat Gan there is someone who is persecuting and attempting to remove religious and faith-oriented signs. Every sign in the town must be placed in accordance with laws and regulations in a permitted place and with the permitted size and from permitted materials after paying the relevant fees.”

Goldis insists that the municipality’s motives are not pure. “The flags fluttering next to my store hurt my feelings. As a former army officer and disabled veteran, nobody will tell me what sign to hang on my private property. If I am violating the law, I’m willing to moderate the size in accordance with municipal regulations. Apparently its not the sign that interests them but it’s Jewish content.”

It should be noted that Shama-Cohen is one of the leading proponents of Shabbat public transport and was the first mayor to publicly announce alternative transport on Shabbat funded by the municipality.

 

 


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Educated Boro parker
Educated Boro parker
3 years ago

I witnessed same thing a few years ago in Jerusalem. Inspectors made chabad remove a mossiach flag from their centers window while a block away a gay flag was allowed to hang from their toeiva center.

Golda
Golda
3 years ago

Hashem yerachem that immoral flags are flown in EY. Kol hakovod to all who proudly are resisting this with spreading the message of Shma Yisroel.

Larry
Larry
3 years ago

Set up a go fund me page I will send the money to pay towards the fine

Shema Yisrael
Shema Yisrael
3 years ago

I saw overwhelm them with Shema signs.

Daniel Balfour
Daniel Balfour
3 years ago

What’s the statutory issue with the sign?