Attorney Alan Dershowitz Sues CNN Over Impeachment Quote

7
AP FILE

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) — Attorney Alan Dershowitz is suing CNN for $300 million, alleging it slandered and libeled him through its editing of a comment he made to the Senate while defending President Donald Trump during his impeachment trial, saying the revision made it falsely appear he “had lost his mind.”

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


Dershowitz, who was part of the legal team defending the president during the trial that ended with Trump’s Feb. 5 acquittal, filed the federal lawsuit Tuesday in South Florida.

The lawsuit centers around comments Dershowitz, 82, made Jan. 29 in response to a question by Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican. It involved whether an allegation that Trump wanted to trade Ukrainian political favors in return for U.S. military aid could be considered grounds for finding the president guilty and removed from office.

The former Harvard Law School professor and frequent media commentator responded, “the only thing that would make a quid pro quo unlawful is if the quo were somehow illegal” — and providing arms to Ukraine wasn’t illegal.

Dershowitz said CNN only played what he said moments later: “Every public official that I know believes that his election is in the public interest and, mostly, they are right, your election is in the public interest, and if the president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment.”

He contends that by playing only the second segment “over and over again” without the first part, CNN made it appear he was arguing a president could avoid impeachment for illegal acts as long as he believed his reelection was in the nation’s best interest. That notion is “preposterous and foolish on its face,” Dershowitz argues in his lawsuit.

“That was the point: to falsely paint Professor Dershowitz as a constitutional scholar and intellect who was lost his mind,” the lawsuit argues.

CNN did not immediately return a call Wednesday seeking comment.

As a public figure, Dershowitz faces difficult hurdles in winning a libel suit. Not only must Dershowitz show CNN’s editing falsified his statements and that act and the statements it caused damaged his reputation, he would also have to show CNN knew its statements were false or were made with reckless disregard for the truth.

Dershowitz is demanding a jury trial.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


7 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Educated Archy
Educated Archy
3 years ago

Sue their brains off and then go after the malicious liar Jullie Brown who slandered and flasley accused Alan of the unthinkable because he dared to support Trump

Stam Misha
Stam Misha
3 years ago

everyone knows which candidate has lost his mind (psst, you put it in the basement joe!). it’s astounding how every single sin the democrats themselves are guilty of is brought up as a charge against their opponents! the democrat hypocrisy knows no limit, their motto is “by any means necessary”

georgeg
georgeg
3 years ago

> he would also have to show CNN knew its statements were false or were made with reckless disregard for the truth.

So what will CNN respond – that it (CNN) is so dumb and has no connection to how people (audience) view or understand its allegedly professional and experienced staff’s presentations? In other words, its defense is almost them same as saying that no one should ever pay any attention to what is broadcasts?

Vote all democrats out of office.
Vote all democrats out of office.
3 years ago

DNCNN Is part of the propagandist arm of the Democrat party. Fake news lying scum.

A G
A G
3 years ago

Here’s a suggestion to Alan Dershowitz: If you don’t want to be quoted for saying idiotic things in an impeachment hearing, it would be a great idea to refrain from saying idiotic things publicly.

Let’s hope a judge dismisses this frivolous, meritless, and frankly narcissistic lawsuit. The American people have much better things to do with their time, taxpayer dollars, and judicial resources than indulging the narcissistic ramblings and grievances of this man who is known for public bullying of anyone who crosses him.