Why Tech Giants Limited The Spread Of NY Post Story On Biden

10
FILE - This combination of photos shows logos for social media platforms Facebook and Twitter. Facebook and Twitter moved quickly this week to limit the spread of a disputed tabloid story promising new twists in the saga of Joe Biden’s relationship with Ukraine. President Donald Trump's campaign quickly seized on the story in the New York Post — but the report raised more questions than answers, including about the authenticity of an email at the center of the story. Wednesday morning Oct. 14, 2020, hours after the story's publication, a Facebook spokesman tweeted that the company was limiting its distribution on the platform.(AP Photo/File)

OAKLAND, California (AP) — When Facebook and Twitter moved quickly this week to limit the spread of an unverified political story published by the conservative-leaning New York Post, it led to predictable cries of censorship from the right. But it also illustrated the slippery hold even the largest tech companies have on the flow of information, particularly in the midst of a raucous presidential election campaign.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


While Facebook and Twitter have often been slow to combat apparent misinformation and other violations of their rules, their response in this case shows how quickly they can move when they want to. Misinformation frequently outpaces the truth on social networks, academic studies have found. But if social media titans aren’t careful, their attempts to clamp down on a story can amplify it further. And even when they exercise caution, they risk generating their own headlines with every move.

For the first time in recent memory, the two social media platforms enforced rules against misinformation on a story from a mainstream media publication. The story in question, which has not been confirmed by other publications, cited unverified emails from Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden’s son that were reportedly discovered by President Donald Trump’s allies.

Trump’s campaign seized on the report, although it raised more questions than answers, including whether emails at the center of the story were hacked or fabricated. Neither company responded when asked if they have previously taken similar action against a mainstream news article, although Facebook said demoting material while it awaits a fact check is common practice.

Facebook used the possibility of false information as the reason to limit the article’s reach, which means its algorithm shows it to fewer people, much the way you might not see as many posts from friends you don’t interact with often. Twitter, meanwhile, blocked users from tweeting out the link to the story and from sending it in private messages.

Though they acted quickly, both companies stumbled on communicating their decision to the public. In part because of this, and in part by the mere act of trying to limit the story, the tech platforms soon became the story, especially in conservative circles where purported bias from Big Tech is already a prime talking point. The fact that a major, big-city newspaper was getting the treatment usually reserved for more fringe outlets added extra fuel to the fire.

“I find this behavior stunning but not surprising from a platform that has censored the President of the United States,” wrote Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) in a letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. Republican lawmakers on Thursday announced plans to subpoena Dorsey to testify about his platform’s actions.

In a somewhat unusual move Wednesday morning, a Facebook spokesman took to Twitter to announce that the company was “reducing” the story’s distribution on the platform while waiting for third-party fact-checkers to verify it. Facebook regularly does this with material that isn’t banned outright from its service, but that risks spreading lies or causing harm in other ways.

Later on Wednesday, Twitter began banning its users from sharing links to the article in tweets and direct messages because it violated the company’s policy that prohibits hacked content. But it didn’t alert its users as to why they couldn’t share the link until hours later.

In a Twitter thread, the company’s safety group said that the images in the article included personal and private information in violation of its rules, and said it considered material included in the article to be a violation of its hacked materials policy.

Dorsey tweeted shortly afterward that it was “unacceptable” that the company had not provided more context around its action.

The Post followed up Wednesday with an article focused on the tech platforms’ purported “censorship.” And Thursday’s print cover of the tabloid shows a photo of Biden and his son with a big blue “CENSORED” stamp and the headline “Facebook and Twitter block Post expose on Hunter Biden files.”


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


10 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jose
Jose
3 years ago

This reads like a press release from Facebook/twitter

H M
H M
3 years ago

The headline says that the article will explain why, but the article itself just whitewashed the crime committed.
The obvious reason why was to protect their candidate. Another leftist article…

Vote all democrats out of office.
Vote all democrats out of office.
3 years ago

The reason they did so is because they are shills for the democrat party working to get Dementia Joe elected, that is why they didn’t censor the Trump tax return article even though the returns contained personal information and were illegally obtained by the NYT.

georgeg
georgeg
3 years ago

Just when did any of these media censor or block such things as the illegally “hacked” Trump tax returns? In fact, was is the difference between “hacked” and “leaked” – I suppose they would block (for example) the Pentagon papers? The computer in question was given willingly to be repaired, and then was apparently abandoned by the customer despite all efforts to reach the customer. Has anyone come out complaining that the material (or even the computer) is their private property and give no permission for the material to be released?

Trump 2020
Trump 2020
3 years ago

The Nazi Democrats , gobalist corporations and media collaborators know that Trump will drop a devastating punishment on China after election , so they are gasping for him to lose.
They make zillions off China_ a genocidal regime who murder infants and toture dissidents in concentration camps. Who force children and women to work for nothing. Who exterminate the Uyigers and created a murderous virus.
But they don’t care.
Pelosi will not negotiate help for job losses because of her swinish pork demands for Blue states who drove citizens into poverty and suicidal depression.
Any sane human of any faith and creed who votes Democrat is a brutal collaborator.

lazy-boy
lazy-boy
3 years ago

a real shame that this dirt is still under the rugs of the press. Biden isn’t the great man he is presented and his son has used his father to make money.

Sally
Sally
3 years ago

Question is why,
We know the answer, because big tech is in the bag together with the media, with the evil radical den-o-rats.
In a normal county Biden would need to drop out after he used his power as VP to enrich his family.

Stam Misha
Stam Misha
3 years ago

I still don’t get it how a glorified blog hosting service and a glorified IRC chat provider got to be so popular and influential.
Maybe the internet does have a dumbing down effect on populations?

YMP
YMP
3 years ago

So smoke indicates fire?

Marcia
Marcia
3 years ago

The story’s content is true yet Facebook and Twitter have gotten so big they believe they can decide what information we will get. This is the new reality of freedom of thePress.